Get All Information That You Search Here
Showing posts with label Timecom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Timecom. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Are Australia's Koalas, Battling Climate Change and Chlamydia, On the Path to Extinction? (Time.com)

This post is in partnership with Worldcrunch, a new global - news site that translates stories of note in foreign languages into English. The article below was originally published in LeMonde.

(SYDNEY) - Although they appear in just about every Australian postcard, koala bears are actually quite hard to spot in the wild, where their numbers are gradually declining. Scientists are now sounding the alarm - and urging Australia's senate to declare the iconic, sleepy-eyed marsupials an endangered species.

Scientists estimate Australia's koala bear population at somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000. "We cannot be totally sure because we don't receive enough public subsidies to thoroughly study the subject. But it is clear that the number is dropping," says Alistair Melzer, a senior researcher at Queensland University. In the Gold Coast region, the number of koala bears seems to have decreased by as much as 80% since the 1990s. (See photos of koalas in Australia.)

There are several factors that might be pushing koala bears close to extinction. Topping the list is urbanization and farming, which have destroyed the cuddly creature's natural habitats. For both food and shelter, koalas rely on large eucalyptus trees that grow in only specific places.

"Unfortunately, the places where koala bears thrive are also the best spots for human beings, namely places with fertile soil," says Melzer. Koala bears are in real trouble when their habitats shrink and they have no other choice but to live near cities. Proximity to humans can mean attacks by domestic dogs, or fatal run-ins with automobiles.

Moreover, the tree-dwelling animals suffer from heat waves and drought, which are likely to be more frequent because of climate change. Koala bears cannot cope with high temperatures, and they need to get moisture from eucalyptus leaves. "If climate change predictions play out, koala bears won't migrate to the South, where temperatures are lower. As a result, they will just die," says Melzer.

Finally, koala bears suffer frequently from Chlamydia, a bacterium. "This is yet another among a multitude of threats that koala bears have to face," says Mathew Crowther, a biologist at the University of Sydney. (See the saga of a stolen koala.)

But while scientists agree that the koala bear could eventually die out, the Australian government has not yet recognized the animal as an "endangered species." Each Australian state has its own list of endangered species. In New South Wales, the koala bear is listed as "vulnerable" statewide, whereas in Queensland, the species is only considered to be at risk in certain specific areas.

Scientists say it's time the government create a national endangered species list. "That is a vicious cycle," says Melzer. "The government has not listed the koala bear as an 'endangered species' because it lacks precise figures. But we don't have enough public subsidies to carry out a long-term research."

To make things even more complicated, there are some areas where the koala population has actually not decreased. That's the case for South Australia, were the animals have been re-introduced in certain areas. But that too poses potential problems for the species, according to Melzer. "Koala bears had almost disappeared in those regions. Only koalas from a narrow segment of the overall population were re-introduced there. As a result, there is no genetic diversity," he says.

The koala issue is now being examined by a special senate committee, which is expected to issue a recommendation by August over whether or not to list the animals as "endangered."

"If the koala bear is listed as an 'endangered species,' it will be good not only for this particular species but also for others that share the same habitats," says Matthew Crowther.

Also from Worldcrunch:

Germany's Move Away from Nuclear Power Will Cost Europe
- Die Welt

Bilderberg: The Global Elite Meet Behind Closed Doors
- Le Temps

The Night They Served E. Coli For Dinner
- Die Welt

See 12 Bizarre Animal Friendships.

See "Saving the World's Endangered Species."

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com:

Are Australia's Koalas, Battling Climate Change and Chlamydia, On the Path to Extinction? (Time.com)

This post is in partnership with Worldcrunch, a new global - news site that translates stories of note in foreign languages into English. The article below was originally published in LeMonde.

(SYDNEY) - Although they appear in just about every Australian postcard, koala bears are actually quite hard to spot in the wild, where their numbers are gradually declining. Scientists are now sounding the alarm - and urging Australia's senate to declare the iconic, sleepy-eyed marsupials an endangered species.

Scientists estimate Australia's koala bear population at somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000. "We cannot be totally sure because we don't receive enough public subsidies to thoroughly study the subject. But it is clear that the number is dropping," says Alistair Melzer, a senior researcher at Queensland University. In the Gold Coast region, the number of koala bears seems to have decreased by as much as 80% since the 1990s. (See photos of koalas in Australia.)

There are several factors that might be pushing koala bears close to extinction. Topping the list is urbanization and farming, which have destroyed the cuddly creature's natural habitats. For both food and shelter, koalas rely on large eucalyptus trees that grow in only specific places.

"Unfortunately, the places where koala bears thrive are also the best spots for human beings, namely places with fertile soil," says Melzer. Koala bears are in real trouble when their habitats shrink and they have no other choice but to live near cities. Proximity to humans can mean attacks by domestic dogs, or fatal run-ins with automobiles.

Moreover, the tree-dwelling animals suffer from heat waves and drought, which are likely to be more frequent because of climate change. Koala bears cannot cope with high temperatures, and they need to get moisture from eucalyptus leaves. "If climate change predictions play out, koala bears won't migrate to the South, where temperatures are lower. As a result, they will just die," says Melzer.

Finally, koala bears suffer frequently from Chlamydia, a bacterium. "This is yet another among a multitude of threats that koala bears have to face," says Mathew Crowther, a biologist at the University of Sydney. (See the saga of a stolen koala.)

But while scientists agree that the koala bear could eventually die out, the Australian government has not yet recognized the animal as an "endangered species." Each Australian state has its own list of endangered species. In New South Wales, the koala bear is listed as "vulnerable" statewide, whereas in Queensland, the species is only considered to be at risk in certain specific areas.

Scientists say it's time the government create a national endangered species list. "That is a vicious cycle," says Melzer. "The government has not listed the koala bear as an 'endangered species' because it lacks precise figures. But we don't have enough public subsidies to carry out a long-term research."

To make things even more complicated, there are some areas where the koala population has actually not decreased. That's the case for South Australia, were the animals have been re-introduced in certain areas. But that too poses potential problems for the species, according to Melzer. "Koala bears had almost disappeared in those regions. Only koalas from a narrow segment of the overall population were re-introduced there. As a result, there is no genetic diversity," he says.

The koala issue is now being examined by a special senate committee, which is expected to issue a recommendation by August over whether or not to list the animals as "endangered."

"If the koala bear is listed as an 'endangered species,' it will be good not only for this particular species but also for others that share the same habitats," says Matthew Crowther.

Also from Worldcrunch:

Germany's Move Away from Nuclear Power Will Cost Europe
- Die Welt

Bilderberg: The Global Elite Meet Behind Closed Doors
- Le Temps

The Night They Served E. Coli For Dinner
- Die Welt

See 12 Bizarre Animal Friendships.

See "Saving the World's Endangered Species."

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com:

When (and Where) to Walk Away from Your Mortgage (Time.com)

In spite of the mild economic recovery we're experiencing, the percentage of homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages - that is, they owe more than their homes are worth - has barely budged.

According to new data from CoreLogic, 22.7 percent of homes with mortgages were underwater in the first quarter of this, versus 23.1 percent in the fourth quarter last year. Nevada is by far the worst off, with 63 percent of mortgaged homes underwater; Arizona, Florida, Michigan, and California round out the top five. (Photos: The Tale of a Lost Mortgage)

So the question is this: If you owe $500,000 on a home that is only worth $150,000, is it OK to toss your keys back to the bank and move into a cheaper rental, instead of diligently paying down a mortgage that is completely out of whack with the value of the house?

CNNMoney recently highlighted a few companies that walk "homeowners" through the process of walking away from their mortgages, and there are a number of practical considerations that might make it a bad idea. If you live in a recourse state, the lender might sue you for the amount of the mortgage that the sale of the property you give back to them doesn't cover. So if you owe $500,000 on the mortgage and the bank only recoups $150,000, they might come after you for $350,000 in a lawsuit if you have that money available in non-retirement assets. So walking away in a recourse-state is probably not a good idea if you have a lot of money.

(Everything you need to know about your mortgage on one page)

But in non-recourse states - Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Minnesota, North Carolina, North Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Washington - the bank has no recourse beyond the repossession of the property.

There are, however, ethical considerations. George Brenkert, a professor of business ethics at Georgetown University, told The Wall Street Journal a couple years ago that people have a moral responsibility to pay their mortgages, and the Mortgage Bankers Association's CEO made the same case: "What about the message they will send to their family and their kids and their friends by defaulting?" Then, in the ultimate act of hypocrisy, the MBA walked away from its own mortgage on its corporate headquarters for exactly the same reason. (See TIME's Cover: What Recovery? The Five Myths About the Economy)

Here's why I think it's perfectly fine to walk away from your mortgage if, after evaluating all the factors, it's the best financial decision for your family: You are acting within the bounds of the contract in a situation that no one had predicted. No one put a gun to the mortgage industry's head and ordered them to make loans in non-recourse states in the midst of a housing bubble. If the situation you're in means that it makes sense to walk away from the mortgage, that's not illegal or even immoral: It's the predictable outcome of the way these loans were written. No need to make yourself a martyr out of obligation to your family, or your bank.

View this article on Time.com

Most Popular on Time.com: